IMHO there are some profiles that are partly invalid (focusing distance used in creation of the profiles seems to differ from the focusing distance of the use and thus yielding invalid corrections for the lens which makes the result considerably worse, you have no chance to create your own profiles to remedy that situation). It also relies heavily on lens+camera profiles and these need to be valid. Take a closer look at those "detailed" areas, you'll see considerable sharpening artifacts. You lose the ability to use a good demosaicing as the DxO one is in my experience not the best (quite contrary, it seems rather crude when you let it run without the noise reduction to see it's characteristics, I rate it below even the basic fast algorithm in Rawtherapee).ĭxO doesn't retain detail, it sharpens whatever the highly destructive noise reduction leave to make you think it's better than it is. What if anything is getting lost when DxO RAW translates from the original camera RAW file to DNG? If you want full control over Denoise, lens corrections, exposure, white balance etc you need DXO-Photolab which is a full raw converter with NIK U-Point technology and layer based local adjustments. It does seem that DxO PureRAW retains a bit more detail in some areas than DeNoise AI so I am interested in seeing if I can incorporate it into my existing workflow. If not how are you supposed to make RAW adjustments to things like exposure when using DxO PureRAW - some third part software that supports DNG format ? What if anything is getting lost when DxO RAW translates from the original camera RAW file to DNG? However using DxO PureRAW it seems this is not going to be possible.Īny idea whether it is possible to use DxO PureRAW denoise on files other than RAW files ? My experience is that the best RAW adjustments are achieved when using the camera vendors RAW editing software since this software seems to offer features specific to the vendors RAW file format. However If I make RAW adjustments using Image Edge Edit and save them to the RAW file DxO PureRAW just ignores them and reverts to using what appears to be the original camera values from the RAW file.ĬAMERA RAW > "RAW Editor" > TIF > "DeNoise AI" > jpg > "Photoshop"ĬAMERA RAW > "DxO Pure RAW" > DNG > "Raw adjustments" > jpg > "Photoshop" With DxO PureRAW it seems you cannot process a TIF file - it will only accept RAW files as input. Process TIF file with DeNoise AI and export as 100% jpg Export adjusted RAW file as one or more TIF files (with different RAW adjustments or crops if required)ģ. Open RAW file and make RAW adjustments to exposure, highlights, shadows etc. My usual workflow after selecting the RAW images I want to process would be the following:ġ. I am testing DxO PureRAW and not sure I understand the workflow one is supposed to use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |